Audit-Ready Process Map Builder
Map how one process actually works — steps, responsibilities, decisions, outputs and evidence. Works for any organisation, publicly or privately funded.
Practical self-assessment tools for any organisation that has to show how its work happens — NGOs, charities and EU-funded programmes, and equally registered services, care and education providers, and businesses bidding for public contracts. This page is the guide: what each tool is for, what comes out of it, and how long it takes — so you do not start with the wrong one.
Three tools, one picture. The process map is the heart of it — the other two are different views of the same map. If you only ever use one thing on this site, use the map. Below: what each tool is for, what comes out of it, how long it takes, and what it deliberately does not do.
Map how one process actually works — steps, responsibilities, decisions, outputs and evidence. Works for any organisation, publicly or privately funded.
24 questions across the four pillars of transparency — Visibility, Sequence, Justification, Auditability. An instant score with band analysis, and a plain reading of where the gaps are.
Twelve plain-language questions that walk through how you communicate, publish and make decisions about people — and find where AI has entered each one.
The European Court of Auditors found there was no reliable overview of EU funding granted to NGOs — and that available information was not sufficiently transparent.European Court of Auditors · Special Report No. 11/2025 (PDF)
In April 2025, the ECA confirmed what many practitioners already knew: over €7.4 billion was awarded to NGOs between 2021 and 2023 with no reliable tracking system. Funders are under pressure to act.
This is the clearest documented example, which is why we use it. But the demand is not unique to grant funding: a regulator's inspection, a tender evaluation, a client audit or an insurer's question all ask the same thing in different words — show us how this actually works.
Organisations that can demonstrate clear, structured transparency — not just paperwork — are better positioned when someone asks. That is what these tools are for.
Across the EU, governance failures are now documented, named, and resulting in enforcement — in publicly funded organisations first, and increasingly wherever a regulator, an inspector or a client can ask to see how the work is done. Organisations that build transparency into their operations — not as a report, but as a system — survive and thrive.
The ECA's 2025 findings, the Charities (Amendment) Act 2024, and ESF+ rule amendments have all sharpened the transparency expectations placed on recipients of public funds. Funders and regulators are increasingly asking organisations to show — not just assert — how their processes work.
Only 60% of registered Irish charities filed annual reports on time in 2024. Governance failures accounted for 42% of concerns raised with the Charities Regulator. Transparent organisations maintain credibility when others face scrutiny.
Transparency is not only about external funders. When decision-making, spending, and priorities are visible to staff and partners, organisations move faster, retain talent, and reduce conflict. Opaque systems create friction and attrition.
Vedomia designs transparency systems for organisations that have to show how their work happens — NGOs and EU-funded programmes most often, and equally registered services, care and education providers, and businesses bidding for public contracts. These tools distil the same diagnostic frameworks used in client engagements — made free so any organisation can start without a consulting budget.
The tools are not tick-box compliance checklists. They assess lived, stakeholder-facing transparency — the kind funders and regulators are increasingly asking about, and the kind that builds genuine institutional trust.
Sandra Ahmidat Fedakova PhD. · Founder, Vedomia Limited
Existing tools from TI, UNDP, and 501 Commons return scores and traffic lights. None assess whether stakeholders actually perceive your organisation as transparent — or explain what your score means in your specific context.
Read our thinking on transparencyThese tools produce human-readable output you can share as a trust signal — not just an internal diagnostic. Results are framed in EU regulatory context and designed to be usable in funder conversations.
See our full servicesNGOs and charities in Ireland and across Europe. SICAP, LEADER and ESF+ delivery organisations, and the managing authorities above them. Registered services and care providers. Education and training providers. Any employer with written procedures. Small businesses bidding for public contracts. If someone can ask you to show how your work happens, these tools are for you.
Get in touch